VERIZON DSL NOISE POLLUTION AND NATIONAL GRID’S DIRTY POWER

11 Comments

1. sandaura sagt:

   31. August 2009 um 16:45

   8 29 2009 3 Town power outage we discovered when we woke this morning at 7 20AM. The high frequencies, pulsing/modulating and mid range pure tones were all radiating in our environment with the power off. This is why we are convinced that the DSL System is leaking pollution and is not compatible with the power grid’s outdated equipment. This is a major pollutant everywhere. These idiots should be locked in a room for 2 years listening to this garbage; they are too dumb to get it otherwise!
2. sandaura sagt:

   31. August 2009 um 16:47

   Verizon, National Grid and the State agencies have not gotten their act together after almost 5 months waiting for a written test plan and continue to treat the hazard in our community as a low level priority. The plan has not been finalized and they will probably be more excuses for not executing the plan. There’s been no protocol executed in the course of 2 years to mitigate. We are being pummeled by RF-EM radiation and constant electrical noise. If the excuse is there is no protocol then..
3. sandaura sagt:

   31. August 2009 um 17:12

   this will further expose the dysfunction and lack of health and safety measures for the citizens of Massachusetts. This is a grave and wreckless injustice.
4. sandaura sagt:

   31. August 2009 um 18:02

   FROM WRONG PLANET (DOT) NETDr Henry Lai and Dr N.P. Singh at the University of Washinton proved way in 1996 that short-term exposure to cell phone radiation broke both single-and dourble-strand DNA in rat brains. Imediately the cell phone industry hired Dr. Herry Phillips, who was working for Motorola and the Department of Energy at the time, to ry to prove Dr. Henry Lai and Dr. Singh’s findings wrong.
5. sandaura sagt:

   31. August 2009 um 18:54

   CONT FROM ABOVEUnfortunately for the cell phone industry, Dr. Jerry Phillips got pretty much the same results as Dr. Henry Lai — i.e. he also found that cell phone radiation broke DNA. And naturally the people at Motorola did not want Dr. Jerry Phillips to go public and publish his research findings. He did anyway and naturally no longer works for Motorola. Phone calls were apparently made to the NIH (National Institute of Health) stating that Dr. Henry Lai was misusing his research funds.
6. sandaura sagt:

   31. August 2009 um 19:20

   They investigated but told him to continue with his research. Letters were apparently also written to the president of the University of Washington demanding that Dr. Henry Lai be fired. This is the crap that people who are honest and tell the truth have to go through from a trillion dollar industry connected to the US military (who are the ones who originally invented the cell phone by the way). So it is no wonder so many doctors and researchers are afraid to speak out on this issue.
7. sandaura sagt:

   31. August 2009 um 20:09

   FROM WRONG PLANET (DOT) NETHey! You know what the definition of Junk Science/Pseudo Science is? It is any kind of science which threatens a corporation’s profits. Actually, the real junk/pseudo science is the crap paid for by corporations and performed by “scientists” who are really prostituting themselves for big money and where the outcome has been decided before they even begin the experiment.
8. sandaura sagt:

   31. August 2009 um 20:50

   CONTINUED FROM ABOVE…A cigarette company executive once said “Doubt is Our Product” and that is exactly what the corporate junk science is meant to do: sow the seeds of doubt and create confusion among the public.
9. sandaura sagt:

   31. August 2009 um 20:56

   Posted on EMFacts consultancyThe Austrian AUVA insurance company commissioned a renowned team ofresearchers from the Vienna Medical University to take another look atbiological effects associated with cell phone radiation. This latestreport shows that there are cells that are most sensitive to cellphone radiation and others less so. Sensitive cells respond with asignificant increase in protein synthesis, indicating an increased level of cell stress—at SAR levels as low as 0.1 W/kg.
10. sandaura sagt:

    31. August 2009 um 21:12

    continued from above…Since affected cells include especially those that are metabolically active,children and youth seem to be most susceptible to the possible healtheffects.More information available at: AUVA Report 2009: Nonthermal Effects Confirmed